linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 03/34] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Add helper to read hypercall data for array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220414132013.1588929-4-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:19:42 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@...zon.de>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/34] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Add helper to read hypercall data for array

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>

Move the guts of kvm_get_sparse_vp_set() to a helper so that the code for
reading a guest-provided array can be reused in the future, e.g. for
getting a list of virtual addresses whose TLB entries need to be flushed.

Opportunisticaly swap the order of the data and XMM adjustment so that
the XMM/gpa offsets are bundled together.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index fb716cf919ed..d66c27fd1e8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1758,38 +1758,51 @@ struct kvm_hv_hcall {
 	sse128_t xmm[HV_HYPERCALL_MAX_XMM_REGISTERS];
 };
 
-static u64 kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc,
-				 int consumed_xmm_halves,
-				 u64 *sparse_banks, gpa_t offset)
-{
-	u16 var_cnt;
-	int i;
 
-	if (hc->var_cnt > 64)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	/* Ignore banks that cannot possibly contain a legal VP index. */
-	var_cnt = min_t(u16, hc->var_cnt, KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS);
+static int kvm_hv_get_hc_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc,
+			      u16 orig_cnt, u16 cnt_cap, u64 *data,
+			      int consumed_xmm_halves, gpa_t offset)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Preserve the original count when ignoring entries via a "cap", KVM
+	 * still needs to validate the guest input (though the non-XMM path
+	 * punts on the checks).
+	 */
+	u16 cnt = min(orig_cnt, cnt_cap);
+	int i, j;
 
 	if (hc->fast) {
 		/*
 		 * Each XMM holds two sparse banks, but do not count halves that
 		 * have already been consumed for hypercall parameters.
 		 */
-		if (hc->var_cnt > 2 * HV_HYPERCALL_MAX_XMM_REGISTERS - consumed_xmm_halves)
+		if (orig_cnt > 2 * HV_HYPERCALL_MAX_XMM_REGISTERS - consumed_xmm_halves)
 			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
-		for (i = 0; i < var_cnt; i++) {
-			int j = i + consumed_xmm_halves;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
+			j = i + consumed_xmm_halves;
 			if (j % 2)
-				sparse_banks[i] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
+				data[i] = sse128_hi(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
 			else
-				sparse_banks[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
+				data[i] = sse128_lo(hc->xmm[j / 2]);
 		}
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	return kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa + offset, sparse_banks,
-			      var_cnt * sizeof(*sparse_banks));
+	return kvm_read_guest(kvm, hc->ingpa + offset, data,
+			      cnt * sizeof(*data));
+}
+
+static u64 kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc,
+				 u64 *sparse_banks, int consumed_xmm_halves,
+				 gpa_t offset)
+{
+	if (hc->var_cnt > 64)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Cap var_cnt to ignore banks that cannot contain a legal VP index. */
+	return kvm_hv_get_hc_data(kvm, hc, hc->var_cnt, KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS,
+				  sparse_banks, consumed_xmm_halves, offset);
 }
 
 static inline int hv_tlb_flush_ring_free(struct kvm_vcpu_hv *hv_vcpu,
@@ -1937,7 +1950,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
 		if (!hc->var_cnt)
 			goto ret_success;
 
-		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, 2, sparse_banks,
+		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, sparse_banks, 2,
 					  offsetof(struct hv_tlb_flush_ex,
 						   hv_vp_set.bank_contents)))
 			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
@@ -2048,7 +2061,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
 		if (!hc->var_cnt)
 			goto ret_success;
 
-		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, 1, sparse_banks,
+		if (kvm_get_sparse_vp_set(kvm, hc, sparse_banks, 1,
 					  offsetof(struct hv_send_ipi_ex,
 						   vp_set.bank_contents)))
 			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
-- 
2.35.1