linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 018/475] virtio-blk: Use blk_validate_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220414110855.662314371@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:06:43 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 018/475] virtio-blk: Use blk_validate_block_size() to validate block size

From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>

commit 57a13a5b8157d9a8606490aaa1b805bafe6c37e1 upstream.

The block layer can't support a block size larger than
page size yet. And a block size that's too small or
not a power of two won't work either. If a misconfigured
device presents an invalid block size in configuration space,
it will result in the kernel crash something like below:

[  506.154324] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
[  506.160416] RIP: 0010:create_empty_buffers+0x24/0x100
[  506.174302] Call Trace:
[  506.174651]  create_page_buffers+0x4d/0x60
[  506.175207]  block_read_full_page+0x50/0x380
[  506.175798]  ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x60/0xa0
[  506.176412]  ? __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x1b2/0x390
[  506.177085]  ? blkdev_direct_IO+0x4a0/0x4a0
[  506.177644]  ? scan_shadow_nodes+0x30/0x30
[  506.178206]  ? lru_cache_add+0x42/0x60
[  506.178716]  do_read_cache_page+0x695/0x740
[  506.179278]  ? read_part_sector+0xe0/0xe0
[  506.179821]  read_part_sector+0x36/0xe0
[  506.180337]  adfspart_check_ICS+0x32/0x320
[  506.180890]  ? snprintf+0x45/0x70
[  506.181350]  ? read_part_sector+0xe0/0xe0
[  506.181906]  bdev_disk_changed+0x229/0x5c0
[  506.182483]  blkdev_get_whole+0x6d/0x90
[  506.183013]  blkdev_get_by_dev+0x122/0x2d0
[  506.183562]  device_add_disk+0x39e/0x3c0
[  506.184472]  virtblk_probe+0x3f8/0x79b [virtio_blk]
[  506.185461]  virtio_dev_probe+0x15e/0x1d0 [virtio]

So let's use a block layer helper to validate the block size.

Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026144015.188-5-xieyongji@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -936,9 +936,17 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_d
 	err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
 				   struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size,
 				   &blk_size);
-	if (!err)
+	if (!err) {
+		err = blk_validate_block_size(blk_size);
+		if (err) {
+			dev_err(&vdev->dev,
+				"virtio_blk: invalid block size: 0x%x\n",
+				blk_size);
+			goto out_free_tags;
+		}
+
 		blk_queue_logical_block_size(q, blk_size);
-	else
+	} else
 		blk_size = queue_logical_block_size(q);
 
 	/* Use topology information if available */