[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyCO23JbqdiwRvdggSSxxe93vyKPNY6H5nk+=y6cJJaxvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:35:45 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 3/4] KVM: X86: Alloc role.pae_root shadow page
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:32 PM Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com> wrote:
>
> All new kinds of sp added in this patchset are in the hash too.
>
I think role.guest_pae_root is needed to distinguish it from
a sp for a level-3 guest page in a 4-level pagetable.
Or just role.guest_root_level(or role.root_level) and it can replace
role.passthrough_depth and role.guest_pae_root and role.pae_root.
role.pae_root will be
(role.root_level == 3 || role.root_level == 2) && role.level == 3 &&
(host is 32bit || !tdp_enabled)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists