linux-kernel - Re: refactor the i915 GVT support and move to the modern mdev API v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220414134321.GD2120790@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 10:43:21 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org" 
        <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support and move to the modern mdev API v3

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 04:40:11PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:

> >> >> git clone https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux -b for-christoph
> >> > 
> >> > There are alot of extra commits on there - is it possible to base this
> >> > straight on rc1 not on some kind of existing DRM tree?
> >> > 
> >> > Why did you choose drm/i915/fbc: Call intel_fbc_activate() directly
> >> > from frontbuffer flush  as a base?
> >> > 
> >> > Jason
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Hi Jason:
> >> 
> >> I updated the branch. You can check if those are what you are expecting. :)
> >
> > This is better, except for the first commit:
> >
> >  [DON'T PULL] drm/i915/dmc: split out dmc registers to a separate file
> >  THIS PATCH WILL GO THROUGH DRM-INTEL-NEXT TO UPSTREAM
> >
> >  Clean up the massive i915_reg.h a bit with this isolated set of
> >  registers.
> >
> >  v2: Remove stale comment (Lucas)
> >
> > Clean the commit message and send that as a proper PR to
> > drm-intel-next, then everything else is OK.
> 
> It's already in drm-intel-next, I guess the problem is basing the branch
> on something that doesn't have it. I'd probably just base everything
> cleanly on -rc1, and whoever does the merge between the two will need to
> account for the missing include in the result. It's just adding one line
> in the right place.

That makes sense to me, especially if you can do the merge fixup
internally in DRM.

So drop the '[DONT PULL]' commit and send a PR to the next DRM tree -
when that is confirmed send the same PR to vfio,

Thanks,
Jason