linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 419/475] SUNRPC: Fix socket waits for write buffer space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:13:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 419/475] SUNRPC: Fix socket waits for write buffer space

From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>

[ Upstream commit 7496b59f588dd52886fdbac7633608097543a0a5 ]

The socket layer requires that we use the socket lock to protect changes
to the sock->sk_write_pending field and others.

Reported-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index 8ffc54b6661f..480e879e74ae 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -872,12 +872,12 @@ static int xs_sendpages(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addrlen,
 /**
  * xs_nospace - handle transmit was incomplete
  * @req: pointer to RPC request
+ * @transport: pointer to struct sock_xprt
  *
  */
-static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
+static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct sock_xprt *transport)
 {
-	struct rpc_xprt *xprt = req->rq_xprt;
-	struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
+	struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &transport->xprt;
 	struct sock *sk = transport->inet;
 	int ret = -EAGAIN;
 
@@ -891,25 +891,49 @@ static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 
 	/* Don't race with disconnect */
 	if (xprt_connected(xprt)) {
+		struct socket_wq *wq;
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
+		set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &wq->flags);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
 		/* wait for more buffer space */
+		set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
 		sk->sk_write_pending++;
 		xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(xprt);
 	} else
 		ret = -ENOTCONN;
 
 	spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock);
+	return ret;
+}
 
-	/* Race breaker in case memory is freed before above code is called */
-	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
-		struct socket_wq *wq;
+static int xs_sock_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
+{
+	struct sock_xprt *transport =
+		container_of(req->rq_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
+	struct sock *sk = transport->inet;
+	int ret = -EAGAIN;
 
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
-		set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &wq->flags);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	if (!sock_writeable(sk))
+		ret = xs_nospace(req, transport);
+	release_sock(sk);
+	return ret;
+}
 
-		sk->sk_write_space(sk);
-	}
+static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req)
+{
+	struct sock_xprt *transport =
+		container_of(req->rq_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
+	struct sock *sk = transport->inet;
+	int ret = -EAGAIN;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk))
+		ret = xs_nospace(req, transport);
+	release_sock(sk);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -996,7 +1020,7 @@ static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 	case -ENOBUFS:
 		break;
 	case -EAGAIN:
-		status = xs_nospace(req);
+		status = xs_stream_nospace(req);
 		break;
 	default:
 		dprintk("RPC:       sendmsg returned unrecognized error %d\n",
@@ -1068,7 +1092,7 @@ static int xs_udp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 		/* Should we call xs_close() here? */
 		break;
 	case -EAGAIN:
-		status = xs_nospace(req);
+		status = xs_sock_nospace(req);
 		break;
 	case -ENETUNREACH:
 	case -ENOBUFS:
@@ -1181,7 +1205,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 		/* Should we call xs_close() here? */
 		break;
 	case -EAGAIN:
-		status = xs_nospace(req);
+		status = xs_stream_nospace(req);
 		break;
 	case -ECONNRESET:
 	case -ECONNREFUSED:
-- 
2.35.1