linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V3 3/4] KVM: X86: Alloc role.pae

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:52:35 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 3/4] KVM: X86: Alloc role.pae_root shadow page

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 5:14 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
> > >
> > > Currently pae_root is special root page, this patch adds facility to
> > > allow using kvm_mmu_get_page() to allocate pae_root shadow page.
> >
> > I don't think this will work for shadow paging.  CR3 only has to be 32-byte aligned
> > for PAE paging.  Unless I'm missing something subtle in the code, KVM will incorrectly
> > reuse a pae_root if the guest puts multiple PAE CR3s on a single page because KVM's
> > gfn calculation will drop bits 11:5.
> 
> I forgot about it.
> 
> >
> > Handling this as a one-off is probably easier.  For TDP, only 32-bit KVM with NPT
> > benefits from reusing roots, IMO and shaving a few pages in that case is not worth
> > the complexity.
> >
> 
> I liked the one-off idea yesterday and started trying it.
> 
> But things were not going as smoothly as I thought.  There are too
> many corner cases to cover.  Maybe I don't get what you envisioned.

Hmm, I believe I was thinking that each vCPU could have a pre-allocated pae_root
shadow page, i.e. keep pae_root, but make it

	struct kvm_mmu_page pae_root;

The alloc/free paths would still need special handling, but at least in theory,
all other code that expects root a shadow page will Just Work.