[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220414152148.cwdefx744kymqcut@treble>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:21:48 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] objtool: Support data symbol printing
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 09:05:47AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 04:19:37PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > @@ -34,8 +37,8 @@ static inline char *offstr(struct section *sec, unsigned long offset)
> >
> > str = malloc(strlen(name) + 20);
> >
> > - if (func)
> > - sprintf(str, "%s()+0x%lx", name, name_off);
> > + if (sym)
> > + sprintf(str, "%s%s+0x%lx", name, is_text ? "()" : "", name_off);
> > else
> > sprintf(str, "%s+0x%lx", name, name_off);
>
> So I like the patch, except that "()" thing is something where we differ
> from the kernel's %ps format and I've cursed it a number of times
> because I then have to manually edit (iow remove) things when pasting it
> in various scripts etc..
Oh, hm, that's true. I can remove them if you prefer.
> That said, it totally makes sense to differentiate between a text and
> data symbol this way :/
Yes, but if we're keeping the "Add sec+offset to warnings" patch then
that distinction is already (kind of) being made by showing the data
section name. And the data symbol warnings should be rare.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists