linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915: stolen memory use ttm backend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f71160e-01cc-40a5-4661-b998b3acd153@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:29:03 +0100
From:   Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>
To:     Thomas Hellström 
        <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drm/i915: stolen memory use ttm backend



On 14/04/2022 15:41, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 4/12/22 21:38, Robert Beckett wrote:
>> +struct ttm_resource *
>> +i915_gem_stolen_reserve_range(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> +                  resource_size_t size,
>> +                  u64 start, u64 end)
>>   {
>> -    int ret;
>> +    struct intel_memory_region *mem = i915->mm.stolen_region;
>> -    if (!drm_mm_initialized(&i915->mm.stolen))
>> -        return -ENODEV;
>> -
>> -    /* WaSkipStolenMemoryFirstPage:bdw+ */
>> -    if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 8 && start < 4096)
>> -        start = 4096;
> 
> Did we lose this Workaround?

woops, looks like we did. Nice catch.
I'll add a reservation at start of day if wa is needed when I issue v4.

> 
> Need to continue reviewing this patchnext week.
> 
> 
> Thx,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -
>> -    mutex_lock(&i915->mm.stolen_lock);
>> -    ret = drm_mm_insert_node_in_range(&i915->mm.stolen, node,
>> -                      size, alignment, 0,
>> -                      start, end, DRM_MM_INSERT_BEST);
>> -    mutex_unlock(&i915->mm.stolen_lock);
>> +    if (!mem)
>> +        return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +    return intel_region_ttm_resource_alloc(mem, size, start, end, 
>> I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
>> +}
>> -