linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V4 00/31] x86/sgx and selftests/sgx: Support SGX2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB5591BBA189BC4EA5CFE2C7EAF6EF9@DM8PR11MB5591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:35:50 +0000
From:   "Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
        "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
        "Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
        "Shanahan, Mark" <mark.shanahan@...el.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 00/31] x86/sgx and selftests/sgx: Support SGX2

Hi Jarkko,

I am working on enabling Gramine with this EDMM patch series. I had tested with V2 patch series and it looked fine. Will evaluate Gramine with V4 patch series and post my updates in a couple of days.

Regards,
-Vijay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2022 9:56 AM
> To: Chatre, Reinette <reinette.chatre@...el.com>;
> dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com; tglx@...utronix.de; bp@...en8.de; Lutomirski,
> Andy <luto@...nel.org>; mingo@...hat.com; linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org;
> x86@...nel.org; shuah@...nel.org; linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Christopherson,, Sean <seanjc@...gle.com>; Huang, Kai
> <kai.huang@...el.com>; Zhang, Cathy <cathy.zhang@...el.com>; Xing,
> Cedric <cedric.xing@...el.com>; Huang, Haitao <haitao.huang@...el.com>;
> Shanahan, Mark <mark.shanahan@...el.com>; Dhanraj, Vijay
> <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>; hpa@...or.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/31] x86/sgx and selftests/sgx: Support SGX2
> 
> On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 09:34 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,
> >
> > On 4/14/2022 4:25 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 14:10 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > > IMHO, we can pull this after +1 version. I think I had only one nit
> > > (one character to a struct name it was), and I've been testing this
> > > series *extensively* with real-world code (wasm run-time that we are
> > > developing), so I'm confident that  it is *good enough*.
> >
> > Thank you very much. I am aware of other teams successfully building
> > on and testing this work. I do hope that they could also provide an
> > ack to help increase the confidence in this work.
> >
> > >
> > > Reinette, for the EMODT patch, as long as you fix the struct name
> > > you can add my reviewed-by and also tested-by to that patch before
> > > you send it! It's so narrow change.
> >
> > Thank you. I will make the struct name change and also plan to make
> > the same change to the function names in that patch to ensure that
> > everything is consistent in that regard.
> 
> I think getting ack from anyone working Graphene-SGX would bring a great
> coverage of different use cases. It's different same of Enarx in the sense that
> both can run arbitrary applicatons written e.g. with C++ although approaches
> are on opposite sides.
> 
> > Reinette
> 
> BR; Jarkko