[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220414192606.GS15609@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:26:06 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc: dsterba@...e.cz, clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
josef@...icpanda.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, terrelln@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zstd: use spin_lock in timer callback
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:55:41PM +0800, Schspa Shi wrote:
> This is an optimization for fix fee13fe96529 ("btrfs:
> correct zstd workspace manager lock to use spin_lock_bh()")
>
> The critical region for wsm.lock is only accessed by the process context and
> the softirq context.
>
> Because in the soft interrupt, the critical section will not be preempted by the
> soft interrupt again, there is no need to call spin_lock_bh(&wsm.lock) to turn
> off the soft interrupt, spin_lock(&wsm.lock) is enough for this situation.
>
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> - Change the commit message to make it more readable.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220408181523.92322-1-schspa@gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Added to misc-next, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists