[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53UZf1sOjegMOSC_m-DiGtDxC-m=w1=9ZbW++J8zK9Omw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:36:00 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, robdclark@...il.com, sean@...rly.run,
vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, quic_aravindh@...cinc.com,
quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: enhance both connect and disconnect
pending_timeout handle
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-04-14 09:34:55)
>
> On 4/13/2022 5:02 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > The subject is still misleading. It is fixing something. It may be
> > enhancing it as well but it is clearly fixing it first.
> >
[...]
> > I'd prefer this part to be a different patch. It can come after the fix
> > to ease backporting.
> >
> > Also, is there any response to Dmitry's question yet? I haven't seen
> > anything.
>
> Sorry, since our internal review does not like this approach.
The internal review shouldn't prevent you from responding to code review
on the mailing list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists