[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n51fc-b-8VF7XP29=o8Xi86HQALGB-1u8n3b_3NjVyyJYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:43:06 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>,
Aravind Venkateswaran <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
> > <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
> >>
> >> These changes are dependent on the following series:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
> >
> > You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
> > What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
> > Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
> > maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
> > at the beginning of your series?
>
> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>
> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be good.
>
Can you resend those as not RFC?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists