linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:43:06 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>,
        Aravind Venkateswaran <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>,
        Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus

Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
> > <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
> >>
> >> These changes are dependent on the following series:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
> >
> > You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
> > What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
> > Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
> > maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
> > at the beginning of your series?
>
> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>
> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be good.
>

Can you resend those as not RFC?