[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc3a3162-b34d-bff3-2109-e2fd0bc65bb4@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:19:53 -0700
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Sankeerth Billakanti" <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>
CC: quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@...cinc.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
"Steev Klimaszewski" <steev@...i.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"Aravind Venkateswaran" <quic_aravindh@...cinc.com>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over
aux_bus
On 4/14/2022 1:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/04/2022 23:00, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry
>>
>> On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31)
>>>> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti
>>>>> <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These changes are dependent on the following series:
>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series.
>>>>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not
>>>>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not,
>>>>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course)
>>>>> at the beginning of your series?
>>>>
>>>> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as
>>>> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree.
>>>> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork:
>>>>
>>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/
>>>>
>>>> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway,
>>>> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also
>>>> be good.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you resend those as not RFC?
>>
>> Yes, please resend these, I can ack them.
>>
>> Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing
>> them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees
>> due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we
>> should get these landed ).
>>
>> Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post
>> them, I can ack the.
>
> Well, you can ack those patches without them being resent. You have
> already added your Reviewed-by to first three patches (which were merged
> during last window).
>
I thought you might have to rebase them :) that way you could have
resent the rebased patch with the RFC tag removed.
If you dont, you now have my R-b.
Thanks
Abhinav
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists