[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YliJzrfXzwwxiCId@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 14:53:34 -0600
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@...wei.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, page-reclaim@...gle.com,
x86@...nel.org, Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Donald Carr <d@...os-reins.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte
<holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@...dex.ru>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 07:47:54PM +0800, Chen Wandun wrote:
>
> On 2022/4/7 11:15, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > +static void inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> > +{
> > + int type;
> > + struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> > +
> > + VM_BUG_ON(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
> > +
> > + for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> > + if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) != MAX_NR_GENS)
> > + continue;
> I'm confused about relation between aging and LRU list operation.
>
> In function inc_max_seq, both min_seq and max_seq will increase,
> the lrugen->lists[] indexed by lru_gen_from_seq(max_seq + 1) may
> be non-empty?
Yes.
> for example,
> before inc_max_seq:
> min_seq == 0, lrugen->lists[0][type][zone]
> max_seq ==3, lrugen->lists[3][type][zone]
>
> after inc_max_seq:
> min_seq ==1, lrugen->lists[1][type][zone]
> max_seq ==4, lrugen->lists[0][type][zone]
>
> If lrugen->lists[0][type][zone] is not empty before inc_max_seq and it is
> the most inactive list,however lurgen->lists[0][type][zone] will become
> the most active list after inc_max_seq.
Correct.
> So, in this place,
>
> if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) != MAX_NR_GENS)
> continue;
>
> should change to
>
> if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MAX_NR_GENS)
> continue;
No, because max/min_seq will overlap if we do so.
lrugen->lists[max_seq+1] can only be non-empty for anon LRU, for a
couple of reasons:
1. We can't swap at all.
2. Swapping is constrained, e.g., swapfile is full.
Both cases are similar to a producer (the aging) overrunning a
consumer (the eviction). We used to handle them, but I simplified the
code because I don't feel they are worth handling [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAOUHufbDfwgm8PgCGkhCjbhMbm=fekfjgRR56NL-j+5iUGfVuw@mail.gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists