linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/70] Introducing the Maple Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOUHufYWq2atD7wqx9rDpHZxpjZN+zP12+ivNBANvCgVUrtxsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 01:39:49 -0600
From:   Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
        "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/70] Introducing the Maple Tree

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:50 AM Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:35:26 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Please add this patch set to your branch.  They are based on v5.18-rc1.
>
> Do we get a nice [0/n] cover letter telling us all about this?
>
> I have that all merged up and it compiles.
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220402094550.129-1-lipeifeng@oppo.com and
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220412081014.399-1-lipeifeng@oppo.com are
> disabled for now.
>
> Several patches were marked
>
> From: Liam
> Signed-off-by: Matthew
> Signed-off-by: Liam
>
> Which makes me wonder whether the attribution was correct.  Please
> double-check.
>
> I made a lame attempt to fix up mglru's get_next_vma(), and it probably
> wants a revisit in the maple-tree world anyway.  Please check this and
> send me a better version ;)

Thanks. This looks good to me.

> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mglru-vs-maple-tree
> +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3704,7 +3704,7 @@ static bool get_next_vma(struct mm_walk
>
>         while (walk->vma) {
>                 if (next >= walk->vma->vm_end) {
> -                       walk->vma = walk->vma->vm_next;
> +                       walk->vma = find_vma(walk->mm, walk->vma->vm_end);
>                         continue;
>                 }
>
> @@ -3712,7 +3712,7 @@ static bool get_next_vma(struct mm_walk
>                         return false;
>
>                 if (should_skip_vma(walk->vma->vm_start, walk->vma->vm_end, walk)) {
> -                       walk->vma = walk->vma->vm_next;
> +                       walk->vma = find_vma(walk->mm, walk->vma->vm_end);
>                         continue;
>                 }
>
> @@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ static void walk_mm(struct lruvec *lruve
>                 /* the caller might be holding the lock for write */
>                 if (mmap_read_trylock(mm)) {
>                         unsigned long start = walk->next_addr;
> -                       unsigned long end = mm->highest_vm_end;
> +                       unsigned long end = TASK_SIZE;
>
>                         err = walk_page_range(mm, start, end, &mm_walk_ops, walk);
>
>
> I flung a tree up at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mmtemp containing
> mglru and mapletree and a few other things.  Could the mglru and
> mapletree people please runtime test it, send any fixes?

Will do.