[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBtzmgJNM=2ekmE0-HT+r=qLqBJ6R1cggkGCNHbb3FPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:54:20 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"parth@...ux.ibm.com" <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
"chris.hyser@...cle.com" <chris.hyser@...cle.com>,
"pkondeti@...eaurora.org" <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
"Valentin.Schneider@....com" <Valentin.Schneider@....com>,
"patrick.bellasi@...bug.net" <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"qperret@...gle.com" <qperret@...gle.com>,
"tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Scheduling tasks on idle cpu
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 01:57, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> wrote:
>
> On 04/12/22 11:07, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 10:39, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> > > Yes I want the CFS scheduler to pick an idle cpu in preference
> > > to an active RT one.
> >
> > When task 34512 wakes up, scheduler checks if prev or this cpu are
> > idle which is not the case for you. Then, it compares the load of prev
> > and this_cpu and seems to select this_cpu (cpu17).
> >
> > Once cpu17 selected, it will try to find an idle cpu which shares LLC
> > but it seems that the scheduler didn't find one and finally keeps task
> > 34512 on this_cpu.
> >
> > Note that during the next tick, a load balance will be trigger if
> > this_cpu still have both RT and task 34512,
>
> David said there are idle cpus
>
> " There are two physical cpu with 20 cores each (with hyperthreading).
> 16, 18, 34, 36 and 38 were idle. So both 16 and 18 should be on the
> same NUMA node. All the others are running the same RT thread code. "
>
> Except for the possibility of them becoming idle just after the task has woken
> up, shouldn't one of them have been picked?
we don't loop on all cpus in the LLC to find an idle one but compute a
reasonable number of iteration based on the avg_idle
David can rerun is use case after disabling sched_feat(SIS_PROP)
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists