[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220414085506.2541732-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 08:55:06 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-sprd: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
index 28e70db9bbba..65b8075da4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd.c
@@ -1008,9 +1008,8 @@ static int sprd_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct sprd_spi *ss = spi_controller_get_devdata(sctlr);
int ret;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ss->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ss->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(ss->dev);
dev_err(ss->dev, "failed to resume SPI controller\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists