linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: support DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <909c4006-255a-a70d-afa2-c821a6e7b28d@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:29:54 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: support DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK()



On 4/13/22 08:19, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/13/22 04:09, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:08:13PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Support the DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK() macro that is used to declare
>>> a bitmap by converting the macro to DECLARE_BITMAP(), as has been done
>>> for the __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK() macro.
>>>
>>> This fixes a 'make htmldocs' warning:
>>>
>>> include/linux/phylink.h:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'DECLARE_PHY_INTERFACE_MASK(supported_interfaces' not described in 'phylink_config'
>>>
>>> that was introduced by commit
>>>   38c310eb46f5 ("net: phylink: add MAC phy_interface_t bitmap")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>>> Cc: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@...linux.org.uk>
>>
>> Thanks Randy, sorry I missed this patch.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
>>
>> What is the intention for merging this patch? Will Jon merge it?
>> Your tags said To: Jon but you don't seem to have included him in
>> the email.
> 
> Hm, I didn't notice that.
> Guess I'll resend it with your R-b.

No need to resend it. It's already merged into mainline.

-- 
~Randy