[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78aa1754-2f04-9f0b-72ef-f06535a413b0@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 09:25:39 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <michael@...le.cc>
CC: <p.yadav@...com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: Parse BFPT to determine the 4-Byte
Address Mode methods
On 4/14/22 12:03, Michael Walle wrote:
Hi!
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
>> index a5211543d30d..2e40eba3744d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
>> @@ -401,6 +401,93 @@ static void
>> spi_nor_regions_sort_erase_types(struct spi_nor_erase_map *map)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * spansion_set_4byte_addr_mode() - Set 4-byte address mode for
>> Spansion
>> + * flashes.
>> + * @nor: pointer to 'struct spi_nor'.
>> + * @enable: true to enter the 4-byte address mode, false to exit the
>> 4-byte
>> + * address mode.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int spansion_set_4byte_addr_mode(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>
> Mh, so now some callback functions are in the core like the quad enable
> methods and some are in sfdp.c. I think there should be only the parsing
> in sfdp.c and all the callback methods should be in core.c; as they are
> potentially used by the vendor modules.
All set_4byte_addr_mode methods are defined in sfdp.c and declared in sfdp.h.
I kept the methods defined in sfdp.c because SFDP defines their behavior/how
they work. Vendors already have access to all these methods when including
core.h (which includes sfdp.h). No need to move them to core, as they are
SFDP specific.
>
>> @@ -606,6 +693,24 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + switch (bfpt.dwords[BFPT_DWORD(16)] & BFPT_DWORD16_4B_ADDR_MODE_MASK)
>> {
>
> I was wondering why this is encoded as single bits and not as an
> enumeration. To me it looks like it is intended to support
because I parse 2 bits and check if both the enter and the exit methods of
the 4b addr mode are specified.
> different methods at the same time. Thus I think there might be
> multiple bits set in each entry and exit mask at once. The spec
> lists all the entries as x_xxx1, x_xx1x, ..
>
>> + case BFPT_DWORD16_4B_ADDR_MODE_BRWR:
> .. then this will only match if exactly these two bits are set.
>
these 2 bits are:
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.h:#define BFPT_DWORD16_4B_ADDR_MODE_BRWR \
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.h- (BFPT_DWORD16_EN4B_BRWR | BFPT_DWORD16_EX4B_BRWR)
When both specified, I set the method.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists