linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the tprot test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220414105322.577439-4-thuth@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:53:21 +0200
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the tprot test

The tprot test currently does not have any output (unless one of
the TEST_ASSERT statement fails), so it's hard to say for a user
whether a certain new sub-test has been included in the binary or
not. Let's make this a little bit more user-friendly and include
some TAP output via the kselftests.h interface.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
index c097b9db495e..a714b4206e95 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/tprot.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include "test_util.h"
 #include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "kselftest.h"
 
 #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
 #define PAGE_SIZE (1 << PAGE_SHIFT)
@@ -69,6 +70,7 @@ enum stage {
 	STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
 	TEST_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE,
 	TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE,
+	NUM_STAGES			/* this must be the last entry */
 };
 
 struct test {
@@ -196,6 +198,7 @@ static void guest_code(void)
 	}									\
 	ASSERT_EQ(uc.cmd, UCALL_SYNC);						\
 	ASSERT_EQ(uc.args[1], __stage);						\
+	ksft_test_result_pass("" #stage "\n");					\
 })
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
@@ -204,6 +207,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	struct kvm_run *run;
 	vm_vaddr_t guest_0_page;
 
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(NUM_STAGES - 1);	/* STAGE_END is not counted, thus - 1 */
+
 	vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
 	run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
 
@@ -213,7 +219,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	guest_0_page = vm_vaddr_alloc(vm, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
 	if (guest_0_page != 0)
-		print_skip("Did not allocate page at 0 for fetch protection override tests");
+		ksft_print_msg("Did not allocate page at 0 for fetch protection override tests\n");
 	HOST_SYNC(vm, STAGE_INIT_FETCH_PROT_OVERRIDE);
 	if (guest_0_page == 0)
 		mprotect(addr_gva2hva(vm, (vm_vaddr_t)0), PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ);
@@ -224,4 +230,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->s.regs.crs[0] |= CR0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_CRS;
 	HOST_SYNC(vm, TEST_STORAGE_PROT_OVERRIDE);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+
+	ksft_finished();
 }
-- 
2.27.0