lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c3aaab9-3bd4-95d4-9f9f-4be9e10e6516@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:20:42 +0000
From:   "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org" 
        <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support and move to the modern mdev API v3

On 4/13/22 11:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:13:06PM +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> Thanks so much for the efforts. I prepared a branch which contains all our patches.The aim of the branch is for the VFIO maintainers to pull the whole bunch easily after the drm-intel-next got merged through drm (as one of the MMIO patches depends on a patch in drm-intel-next).
>>
>> I dropped patch 4 and patch 5 as they have been covered by Jani's patches. Some conflicts was solved.
>> QA is going to test it today. 
>>
>> You can find it here:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux -b for-christoph
> 
> There are alot of extra commits on there - is it possible to base this
> straight on rc1 not on some kind of existing DRM tree?
> 
> Why did you choose drm/i915/fbc: Call intel_fbc_activate() directly
> from frontbuffer flush  as a base?
> 
> Jason
> 

Hi Jason:

I updated the branch. You can check if those are what you are expecting. :)

Thanks,
Zhi.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ