[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c3aaab9-3bd4-95d4-9f9f-4be9e10e6516@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 12:20:42 +0000
From: "Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support and move to the modern mdev API v3
On 4/13/22 11:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 11:13:06PM +0000, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> Thanks so much for the efforts. I prepared a branch which contains all our patches.The aim of the branch is for the VFIO maintainers to pull the whole bunch easily after the drm-intel-next got merged through drm (as one of the MMIO patches depends on a patch in drm-intel-next).
>>
>> I dropped patch 4 and patch 5 as they have been covered by Jani's patches. Some conflicts was solved.
>> QA is going to test it today.
>>
>> You can find it here:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/gvt-linux -b for-christoph
>
> There are alot of extra commits on there - is it possible to base this
> straight on rc1 not on some kind of existing DRM tree?
>
> Why did you choose drm/i915/fbc: Call intel_fbc_activate() directly
> from frontbuffer flush as a base?
>
> Jason
>
Hi Jason:
I updated the branch. You can check if those are what you are expecting. :)
Thanks,
Zhi.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists