[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdOf3+j8yQh=-f6iCN_gRhisgoQjov2kK1fhgv7xaBJRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:45:37 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH v3 0/2] serial: 8250: Fixes for Oxford Semiconductor
950 UARTs
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 1:53 AM Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...am.me.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2022, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > Here's v3 of the outstanding fixes for Oxford Semiconductor 950 UARTs.
> > As the change for the default FIFO rx trigger level has been already
> > merged with commit d7aff291d069 ("serial: 8250: Define RX trigger levels
> > for OxSemi 950 devices") only one patch of the original series remains.
>
> Ping for:
> <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203310114210.44113@angie.orcam.me.uk/>
I still didn't get the answer why BOTHER can't be used instead of
spreading the old hack. You mentioned fractional baud rates and
something else, and I asked why do you need them and from where you
got the limitation of 16-bit values for dividers when using BOTHER.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists