[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGcXWkx6fZZ3kMnGuXtAA+WatJMf1dq_vd6fiFAocH9b03CWcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 21:18:34 +0800
From: 郭力豪 <lhjeff911@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
呂芳騰LuWells <wells.lu@...plus.com>,
"lh.kuo" <lh.kuo@...plus.com>, nathan@...nel.org,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: remove spin_lock_irq in the irq procress
Hi Mr.Mark :
I will remove the variable "psim->lock" in the next patch
Li-hao Kuo
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 於 2022年4月13日 週三 下午7:32寫道:
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:38:00AM +0800, Li-hao Kuo wrote:
> > - remove spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq in the irq funciton
>
> It looks like this is the only use of the lock so the variable can be
> removed as well?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists