[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlnncKoQwr8iW9Ji@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 23:45:20 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Lucas Tanure <tanure@...ux.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: meson: Use 50% duty cycle for I2C clock
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 05:43:34PM +0100, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> The duty cycle of 33% is less than the required
> by the I2C specs for the LOW period of the SCL
> clock.
>
> Move the duty cyle to 50% for 100Khz or lower
> clocks, and (40% High SCL / 60% Low SCL) duty
> cycle for clocks above 100Khz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanure@...ux.com>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists