[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3608313.MHq7AAxBmi@leap>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 06:29:15 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
Cc: phil@...lpotter.co.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, jhpark1013@...il.com,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] staging: r8188eu: remove unused member free_bss_buf
On venerdì 15 aprile 2022 04:48:32 CEST Jaehee Park wrote:
> The free_bss_buf member of pmlmepriv is unused. Remove all related
> lines.
>
> Suggested-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme.h | 1 -
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme.h b/drivers/
staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme.h
> index 1dc1fbf049af..0f03ac43079c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/include/rtw_mlme.h
> @@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ struct mlme_priv {
> struct list_head *pscanned;
> struct __queue free_bss_pool;
> struct __queue scanned_queue;
> - u8 *free_bss_buf;
> u8 key_mask; /* use to restore wep key after hal_init */
> u32 num_of_scanned;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/
r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index 3e9882f89f76..aed868d1d47b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ static int _rtw_init_mlme_priv(struct adapter
*padapter)
> res = _FAIL;
> goto exit;
> }
> - pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf = pbuf;
Hi Jaehee,
"pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf" is assigned with "pbuf". The latter is a pointer
to virtually contiguous memory which was allocated by vmalloc() or
vzalloc() (I didn't check, but the vfree() in _rtw_free_mlme_priv() tells
me that indeed it was).
> pnetwork = (struct wlan_network *)pbuf;
>
> @@ -109,13 +108,7 @@ void rtw_free_mlme_priv_ie_data(struct mlme_priv
*pmlmepriv)
>
> void _rtw_free_mlme_priv(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv)
> {
> -
> rtw_free_mlme_priv_ie_data(pmlmepriv);
> -
> - if (pmlmepriv) {
> - vfree(pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf);
> - }
Therefore, here you are causing a memory leak, which is something you
should avoid :)
Why did you delete that call to vfree()?
I think that you are misunderstanding what Pavel said. Even if it were true
that the code makes no use of that region of memory (again, I didn't
check), nevertheless, that memory was allocated somewhere and its address
is now in "pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf".
If you can confirm that this memory is allocated for no purpose you should
also remove the call to vmalloc() / vzalloc().
Thanks,
Fabio M. De Francesco
> -
> }
>
> struct wlan_network *_rtw_alloc_network(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv)/*
_queue *free_queue) */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists