[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220415000133.3955987-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 17:01:29 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] mm: memcg kselftests fixes
I'm resending two memcg kselftests fixes, which I first posted in 2019 [1],
however they didn't go anywhere. I've rechecked them and they're are both
still actual, even though there were new regressions introduced since that,
so not all tests are passing now. I know that David Vernet (cc'ed) is working
on fixing (some of) them, so hopefully he'll post more fixes soon.
I believe it's better for such patches to go through mm and cgroup trees
(and mailing lists), where there are better chances for them to be properly
reviewed, so adding corresponding entries to the MAINTAINERS file to make it
obvious.
1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191203165758.GA607734@chrisdown.name/T/
Roman Gushchin (4):
kselftests: memcg: update the oom group leaf events test
kselftests: memcg: speed up the memory.high test
MAINTAINERS: add corresponding kselftests to cgroup entry
MAINTAINERS: add corresponding kselftests to memcg entry
MAINTAINERS | 3 +++
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists