[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXH0x5Va7Wgs+mU1ONDwwsazOBuN4z4ihVzO2uG-n41Kbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:05:21 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] crypto: Use ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead of ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 09:52, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 09:49:12AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand what would go wrong if that assumption no
> > longer holds.
>
> It's very simple, we don't do anything to the pointer returned
> by kmalloc before returning it as a tfm or other object with
> an alignment of CRYPTO_MINALIGN. IOW if kmalloc starts returning
> pointers that are not aligned to CRYPTO_MINALIGN then we'd be
> lying to the compiler.
>
I guess that should be fixable. GIven that this is about padding
rather than alignment, we could do something like
struct crypto_request {
union {
struct {
... fields ...
};
u8 __padding[ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN];
};
void __ctx[] __align(CRYPTO_MINALIGN);
};
And then hopefully, we can get rid of the padding once we fix drivers
doing non-cache coherent inbound DMA into those structures.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists