linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOvjArSb4avVaV25925z+e5eKW89Q6k+AsPSq1yS+kroG_a=ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:56:46 +0530
From:   Arun Ajith S <aajith@...sta.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        dsahern@...nel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, prestwoj@...il.com,
        gilligan@...sta.com, noureddine@...sta.com, gk@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na
 knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131

Sorry, it wasn't the mailer.
The rst file in my patch was missing tabs.
I have fixed it and verified the generated HTML is correct.
I'll post v6 with the fix.

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 1:09 PM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/15/22 12:42, Arun Ajith S wrote:
> > +accept_unsolicited_na - BOOLEAN
> > +     Add a new neighbour cache entry in STALE state for routers on receiving an
> > +     unsolicited neighbour advertisement with target link-layer address option
> > +     specified. This is as per router-side behavior documented in RFC9131.
> > +     This has lower precedence than drop_unsolicited_na.
> > +
> > +   ====   ======  ======  ==============================================
> > +      drop   accept  fwding                   behaviour
> > +      ----   ------  ------  ----------------------------------------------
> > +         1        X       X  Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack
> > +         0        0       X  Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC
> > +         0        1       0  Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC
> > +         0        1       1  Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE
> > +                             NC entry
> > +   ====   ======  ======  ==============================================
> > +
>
> Hi,
>
> Building htmldocs with this patch, there are no more warnings from v4, but
> I don't see the table above generated in the output. I guess due to
> whitespace-mangling issues on your mailer, because the table syntax alignment
> (the =-s) don't match the contents/cells.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara