| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YllADL6uMoLllzQo@fyu1.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 02:51:08 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: "zhangfei.gao@...mail.com" <zhangfei.gao@...mail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
jean-philippe <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID
allocation and free it on mm exit
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 06:08:09PM +0800, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com wrote:
>
> On 2022/4/12 下午11:35, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com wrote:
> > Hi, Fenghua
> >
> > On 2022/4/12 下午9:41, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > > Hi, Zhangfei,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 03:04:09PM +0800, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/4/11 下午10:52, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > > On 4/11/22 07:44, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com wrote:
> > > > > > On 2022/4/11 下午10:36, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > > > > On 4/11/22 07:20, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com wrote:
> > Agree with Dave, I think user space should not be broken.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Any plan about this regression?
> Currently I need this patch to workaround the issue.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> index 22ddd05bbdcd..2d74ac53d11c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/mmu_context.h>
> #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ arm_smmu_sva_bind(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct
> *mm, void *drvdata)
>
> mutex_lock(&sva_lock);
> handle = __arm_smmu_sva_bind(dev, mm);
> + mmget(mm);
> mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
> return handle;
> }
> @@ -377,6 +379,7 @@ void arm_smmu_sva_unbind(struct iommu_sva *handle)
> arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(bond->smmu_mn);
> kfree(bond);
> }
> + mmput(bond->mm);
> mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
> }
Could you please review and/or test this patch? It's supposed to fix
the PASID issue on both ARM and X86.
>From a6444e1e5bd8076f5e5c5e950d3192de327f0c9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 00:51:33 -0700
Subject: [RFC PATCH] iommu/sva: Fix PASID use-after-free issue
A PASID might be still used even though it is freed on mm exit.
process A:
sva_bind();
ioasid_alloc() = N; // Get PASID N for the mm
fork(): // spawn process B
exit();
ioasid_free(N);
process B:
device uses PASID N -> failure
sva_unbind();
Dave Hansen suggests to take a refcount on the mm whenever binding the
PASID to a device and drop the refcount on unbinding. The mm won't be
dropped if the PASID is still bound to it.
Fixes: 701fac40384f ("iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID allocation and free it on mm exit")
Reported-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...mail.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
index 22ddd05bbdcd..3fcb842a0df0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include "arm-smmu-v3.h"
#include "../../iommu-sva-lib.h"
@@ -363,6 +364,9 @@ arm_smmu_sva_bind(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void *drvdata)
mutex_lock(&sva_lock);
handle = __arm_smmu_sva_bind(dev, mm);
+ /* Take an mm refcount on a successful bind. */
+ if (!IS_ERR(handle))
+ mmget(mm);
mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
return handle;
}
@@ -372,6 +376,8 @@ void arm_smmu_sva_unbind(struct iommu_sva *handle)
struct arm_smmu_bond *bond = sva_to_bond(handle);
mutex_lock(&sva_lock);
+ /* Drop an mm refcount. */
+ mmput(bond->mm);
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&bond->refs)) {
list_del(&bond->list);
arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(bond->smmu_mn);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 23a38763c1d1..345a0d5d7922 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
goto free_sdev;
list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs);
+ /* Take an mm refcount on binding mm. */
+ mmget(mm);
success:
return &sdev->sva;
@@ -465,6 +467,8 @@ static int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
kfree(svm);
}
}
+ /* Drop an mm reference on unbinding mm. */
+ mmput(mm);
}
out:
return ret;
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists