lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:17:25 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interrrupt-controller: uniphier-aidet: Use
 unevaluatedProperties

Hi Rob,

On 2022/04/14 4:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:47:44PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
>> This refers common bindings, so this is preferred for
>> unevaluatedProperties instead of additionalProperties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/interrupt-controller/socionext,uniphier-aidet.yaml | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/socionext,uniphie
> r-aidet.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/socionext,uniphie
> r-aidet.yaml
>> index f89ebde76dab..77f2d58a9c3f 100644
>> ---
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/socionext,uniphie
> r-aidet.yaml
>> +++
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/socionext,uniphie
> r-aidet.yaml
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ required:
>>     - interrupt-controller
>>     - '#interrupt-cells'
>>   
>> -additionalProperties: false
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> 
> As mentioned elsewhere, not necessary here.

Yes, I withdraw this patch for the same reason.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ