[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77c83f45-3782-624d-36c4-dec5c53cdd09@amlogic.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 21:35:44 +0800
From: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: meson: Added 12Mhz as the clock source
for calculating baud rate
Hi Neil,
Thank you for your reply.
On 2022/4/7 22:03, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 07/04/2022 10:13, Yu Tu wrote:
>> Starting with the g12A chip, add a 12Mhz clock to calculate the baud
>> rate, since the BT module uses 3Mhz baud rate. 8Mhz calculations can
>> lead to baud rate bias, causing some problems.
>
> The commit message isn't clear enough, 12MHz is a new intermediate clock
> rate, not a new clock source of the UART module.
>
> Please explain a /2 divider over XTAL was introduced since G12A, and
> is preferred to be used over the still present /3 divider since it
> provides much closer frequencies vs the request baudrate.
>
I will prepare the next version of the code as you requested.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> index 8e59624935af..7e77693a1318 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
>> #define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK 0x7fffff
>> #define AML_UART_BAUD_USE BIT(23)
>> #define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL BIT(24)
>> +#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2 BIT(27)
>> #define AML_UART_PORT_NUM 12
>> #define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET 6
>> @@ -80,6 +81,10 @@ static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver;
>> static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM];
>> +struct meson_uart_data {
>> + bool has_xtal_div2;
>> +};
>> +
>> static void meson_uart_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *port, unsigned
>> int mctrl)
>> {
>> }
>> @@ -293,13 +298,20 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port
>> *port)
>> static void meson_uart_change_speed(struct uart_port *port, unsigned
>> long baud)
>> {
>> - u32 val;
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>> + u32 val = 0;
>> while (!meson_uart_tx_empty(port))
>> cpu_relax();
>> if (port->uartclk == 24000000) {
>> - val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk / 3, baud) - 1;
>> + unsigned int xtal_div = 3;
>> +
>> + if (private_data->has_xtal_div2) {
>> + xtal_div = 2;
>> + val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2;
>> + }
>> + val |= DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk / xtal_div, baud) - 1;
>> val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL;
>> } else {
>> val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk / 4, baud) - 1;
>> @@ -691,6 +703,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct
>> platform_device *pdev,
>> static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data;
>> struct resource *res_mem;
>> struct uart_port *port;
>> u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */
>> @@ -733,6 +746,13 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> if (!port)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> + private_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct
>> meson_uart_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!private_data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if ((bool)device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev))
>> + private_data->has_xtal_div2 = true;
>
> It should be much cleaner to pass meson_uart_data to meson_uart_dt_match
> .data,
> and then you can retrieve device_get_match_data() and put the result into
> port->private_data.
> This will avoid a devm_kzalloc().
>
> Then in meson_uart_change_speed() change the test to check for NULL
> private_data:
> if (private_data && private_data->has_xtal_div2)
>
>> +
>> ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(pdev, port);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> @@ -749,6 +769,7 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> port->x_char = 0;
>> port->ops = &meson_uart_ops;
>> port->fifosize = fifosize;
>> + port->private_data = private_data;
>> meson_ports[pdev->id] = port;
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
>
> Neil
>
I will prepare the next version of the code as you requested.
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists