[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CO1PR11MB5089695CB3733F4B1284E3CED6EE9@CO1PR11MB5089.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:31:51 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: ivecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Fei Liu <feliu@...hat.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, mschmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
"Brett Creeley" <brett.creeley@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by
cfg_lock in ice_vc_process_vf_msg()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2022 9:39 AM
> To: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Fei Liu <feliu@...hat.com>; moderated list:INTEL
> ETHERNET DRIVERS <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>; mschmidt
> <mschmidt@...hat.com>; Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@...el.com>; open list
> <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] ice: Protect vf_state check by cfg_lock in
> ice_vc_process_vf_msg()
>
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 13:55:02 +0200
> Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:22:59AM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> > > Previous patch labelled "ice: Fix incorrect locking in
> > > ice_vc_process_vf_msg()" fixed an issue with ignored messages
> >
> > tiny tiny nit: double space after "
> > Also, has mentioned patch landed onto some tree so that we could provide
> > SHA-1 of it? If not, then maybe squashing this one with the mentioned one
> > would make sense?
>
> Well, that commit were already tested and now it is present in Tony's queue
> but not in upstream yet. It is not problem to squash together but the first
> was about ignored VF messages and this one is about race and I didn't want
> to make single patch with huge description that cover both issues.
> But as I said, no problem to squash if needed.
>
> Thx,
> Ivan
I'm fine with either squashing or keeping them as separate changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists