| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220416053902.68517-4-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:38:59 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
yosryahmed@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, gthelen@...gle.com,
a.manzanares@...sung.com, heekwon.p@...sung.com,
gim.jongmin@...sung.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mm: make __node_reclaim() more flexible
Currently __node_reclaim() is tailored to the allocator paths. With
proactive per-node reclaim it requires a bit more flexibly:
- Deal in terms of nr_pages instead of order. Similarly this also
applies to the respective tracing.
- Make the caller pass an already armed scan control.
- Return number of reclaimed pages. The caller can trivially check
against this explicitly instead.
The current node_reclaim() interface remains the same.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
---
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 12 ++++-----
mm/vmscan.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
index de136dbd623a..ab6ce8d8770b 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
@@ -439,25 +439,25 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin,
- TP_PROTO(int nid, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags),
+ TP_PROTO(int nid, unsigned long nr_pages, gfp_t gfp_flags),
- TP_ARGS(nid, order, gfp_flags),
+ TP_ARGS(nid, nr_pages, gfp_flags),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(int, nid)
- __field(int, order)
+ __field(int, nr_pages)
__field(gfp_t, gfp_flags)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__entry->nid = nid;
- __entry->order = order;
+ __entry->nr_pages = nr_pages;
__entry->gfp_flags = gfp_flags;
),
- TP_printk("nid=%d order=%d gfp_flags=%s",
+ TP_printk("nid=%d nr_pages=%d gfp_flags=%s",
__entry->nid,
- __entry->order,
+ __entry->nr_pages,
show_gfp_flags(__entry->gfp_flags))
);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index cb583fcbf5bf..1735c302831c 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4668,36 +4668,28 @@ static unsigned long node_pagecache_reclaimable(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
/*
* Try to free up some pages from this node through reclaim.
+ * Returns the number of reclaimed pages.
*/
-static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
+static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
+ gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long nr_pages,
+ struct scan_control *sc)
{
/* Minimum pages needed in order to stay on node */
- const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
struct task_struct *p = current;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
- struct scan_control sc = {
- .nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
- .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
- .order = order,
- .priority = NODE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY,
- .may_writepage = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
- .may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
- .may_swap = 1,
- .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
- };
unsigned long pflags;
- trace_mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin(pgdat->node_id, order,
- sc.gfp_mask);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_begin(pgdat->node_id, nr_pages,
+ sc->gfp_mask);
cond_resched();
psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
- fs_reclaim_acquire(sc.gfp_mask);
+ fs_reclaim_acquire(sc->gfp_mask);
/*
* We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_UNMAP
*/
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
- set_task_reclaim_state(p, &sc.reclaim_state);
+ set_task_reclaim_state(p, &sc->reclaim_state);
if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages) {
/*
@@ -4705,23 +4697,34 @@ static int __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned in
* priorities until we have enough memory freed.
*/
do {
- shrink_node(pgdat, &sc);
- } while (sc.nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc.priority >= 0);
+ shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
+ } while (sc->nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc->priority >= 0);
}
set_task_reclaim_state(p, NULL);
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
- fs_reclaim_release(sc.gfp_mask);
+ fs_reclaim_release(sc->gfp_mask);
psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
- trace_mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed);
+ trace_mm_vmscan_node_reclaim_end(sc->nr_reclaimed);
- return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
+ return sc->nr_reclaimed;
}
int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
{
int ret;
+ const unsigned long nr_pages = 1 << order;
+ struct scan_control sc = {
+ .nr_to_reclaim = max(nr_pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
+ .gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(gfp_mask),
+ .order = order,
+ .priority = NODE_RECLAIM_PRIORITY,
+ .may_writepage = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
+ .may_unmap = !!(node_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_UNMAP),
+ .may_swap = 1,
+ .reclaim_idx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask),
+ };
/*
* Node reclaim reclaims unmapped file backed pages and
@@ -4756,7 +4759,7 @@ int node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
if (test_and_set_bit(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags))
return NODE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
- ret = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask, order);
+ ret = __node_reclaim(pgdat, gfp_mask, nr_pages, &sc) >= nr_pages;
clear_bit(PGDAT_RECLAIM_LOCKED, &pgdat->flags);
if (!ret)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists