[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220416093753.3054696-6-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:37:53 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: <jack@...e.cz>, <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 5/5] block, bfq: do not idle if only one cgroup is activated
Now that root group is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs',
'num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario().
Thus change the condition to 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1'.
On the other hand, now that 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' represents
how many groups have pending requests, this change can enable concurrent
sync io is only on cgroup is activated.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 39abcd95df8e..7d9f94882f8e 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
- || bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0
+ || bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 1
#endif
;
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists