lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 19:59:35 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: zstd: remove extraneous asterix at the head of zstd_reclaim_timer_fn() comment

kernel test robot reports kernel-doc warning:

>> fs/btrfs/zstd.c:98: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst

The comment is for zstd_reclaim_timer_fn(). Since the function is
static, the comment isn't meant for kernel-doc consumption.

Remove the extraneous (second) asterix at the head of function comment.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202204151934.CkKcnvuJ-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: b672526e2ee935 ("btrfs: use non-bh spin_lock in zstd timer callback")
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>
Cc: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
---
 In the previous fix attempt [1], Matthew Wilcox suggested to remove the
 second asterix instead since the function is static and it shouldn't
 have kernel-doc comments.

 [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/YluGmERvtQY9ju7Y@casper.infradead.org/

 This patch is based on btrfs-devel/misc-next tree [2].

 [2]: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git

 fs/btrfs/zstd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
index 0fe31a6f6e68f0..ca2102a46faefd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zstd.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline struct workspace *list_to_workspace(struct list_head *list)
 void zstd_free_workspace(struct list_head *ws);
 struct list_head *zstd_alloc_workspace(unsigned int level);
 
-/**
+/*
  * Timer callback to free unused workspaces.
  *
  * @t: timer

base-commit: 550a34e972578538fd0826916ae4fc407b62bb68
-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ