[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418063059.2558074-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:30:59 +0000
From:   cgel.zte@...il.com
To:     nm@...com
Cc:     ssantosh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
 drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
index 7bab4bbaf02d..ce09c42eaed2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
@@ -555,11 +555,9 @@ static int am33xx_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
 
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_pm_runtime_disable;
-	}
 
 	ret = pm_ops->init(am33xx_do_sram_idle);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
