[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418063059.2558074-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:30:59 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: nm@...com
Cc: ssantosh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] soc: ti: pm33xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
index 7bab4bbaf02d..ce09c42eaed2 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pm33xx.c
@@ -555,11 +555,9 @@ static int am33xx_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto err_pm_runtime_disable;
- }
ret = pm_ops->init(am33xx_do_sram_idle);
if (ret) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists