[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220418141253.24298-6-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 22:12:46 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <vbabka@...e.cz>, <pintu@...eaurora.org>,
<charante@...eaurora.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] mm: compaction: clean up comment about suitable migration target recheck
checked_pageblock is already removed and suitable_migration_target is not
rechecked under the zone lock since commit f8224aa5a0a4 ("mm, compaction:
do not recheck suitable_migration_target under lock"). Correct the comment
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/compaction.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index e839b26fb3d8..97821b7d7a4f 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -599,13 +599,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
if (!PageBuddy(page))
goto isolate_fail;
- /*
- * If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking.
- * Note that if we hold the lock now, checked_pageblock was
- * already set in some previous iteration (or strict is true),
- * so it is correct to skip the suitable migration target
- * recheck as well.
- */
+ /* If we already hold the lock, we can skip some rechecking. */
if (!locked) {
locked = compact_lock_irqsave(&cc->zone->lock,
&flags, cc);
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists