linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the scene where group's imbalance is set incorrectly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220418123116.2e4f6b1e@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:31:16 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     zgpeng <zgpeng.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the scene where group's imbalance is
 set incorrectly

On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:58:36 +0800
zgpeng <zgpeng.linux@...il.com> wrote:

> The specific trigger scenarios are as follows. In the
> load_balance function, the first loop picks out the busiest
> cpu. During the process of pulling the process from the
> busiest cpu, it is found that all tasks cannot be run on the
> DST cpu. At this time, both LBF_SOME_PINNED andLBF_ALL_PINNED
> of env.flags are set. Because balance fails and LBF_SOME_PINNED
> is set, the parent group's mbalance flag will be set to 1. At
> the same time, because LBF_ALL_PINNED is set, it will re-enter
> the second cycle to select another busiest cpu to pull the process.
> Because the busiest CPU has changed, the process can be pulled to
> DST cpu, so it is possible to reach a balance state.

But is the next cpu selected really the busiest CPU? Or is the original
still the busiest but doesn't have any tasks that can migrate to the dst
CPU? Does it really mean the parent is now unbalanced?

-- Steve


> 
> But at this time, the parent group's imbalance flag is not set
> correctly again. As a result, the load balance is successfully
> achieved, but the parent group's imbalance flag is incorrectly
> set to 1. In this case, the upper-layer load balance will
> erroneously select this domain as the busiest group, thereby
> breaking the balance.