linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Remove sc7180/sdx55 ipa compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE-0n53yggqX+mNcRQ+_iVHZhZgw-cCBVSC+ka++vwprpKMaGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:48:08 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: Remove sc7180/sdx55 ipa compatibles

Quoting Alex Elder (2022-04-15 13:15:21)
> On 4/14/22 7:58 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > These interconnects are modeled as clks, not interconnects, therefore
> > remove the compatibles from the binding as they're unused.
> >
> > Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
> > Cc: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>
> What's the proper thing to do for properties that stop being
> used?  Do we delete them, like this, or deprecate them somehow?
> Old DTBs might define the values that are deleted here.

I think we leave them around until the last dts user stops using them.

>
> Shouldn't devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>   be copied on this and
> the other DTS patches?

Sure. I added it now. Thanks.

>
> > ---
> >
> > I don't know who should apply this. Probably whoever takes the dtsi
> > patches, Bjorn?, because otherwise dt_bindings_check will fail.
> >
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml | 2 --
> >   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > index 5a911be0c2ea..ab859150c7f7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpmh.yaml
> > @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ properties:
> >         - qcom,sc7180-config-noc
> >         - qcom,sc7180-dc-noc
> >         - qcom,sc7180-gem-noc
> > -      - qcom,sc7180-ipa-virt
> >         - qcom,sc7180-mc-virt
> >         - qcom,sc7180-mmss-noc
> >         - qcom,sc7180-npu-noc
> > @@ -68,7 +67,6 @@ properties:
> >         - qcom,sdm845-mem-noc
> >         - qcom,sdm845-mmss-noc
> >         - qcom,sdm845-system-noc
> > -      - qcom,sdx55-ipa-virt
> >         - qcom,sdx55-mc-virt
> >         - qcom,sdx55-mem-noc
> >         - qcom,sdx55-system-noc
>