[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yl3Vvhw+NKfC503u@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:18:54 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/sev] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 12:40:11PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The driver name is used when registering the driver in
> snp_init_platform_device() and isn't really referenced after that. The
> module name is sevguest.ko, while the device name ends up being
> /dev/sev-guest.
>
> All that really matters is the device name that is exposed to user space.
> But if we want things to match, then, yes, we can change the name that is
> used in arch/x86/kernel/sev.c and drivers/virt/coco/sevguest/sevguest.c
> to "sev-guest" if that works. Do you want the module name to also be
> sev-guest.ko?
Just to ack this on the ML after our IRC discussion: yeah, let's keep
the common driver name sev-guest in order to avoid confusion. Other
functionality like SEV-ES or only SEV can still go in there, if needed,
but the name can remain.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists