[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n51PX1SgqiB5vgoOLunkrxiWxH2O=jCCM5gNL97O8Ltt4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:29:15 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: Add peripheral
charger count API
Quoting Prashant Malani (2022-04-18 16:21:52)
> On Apr 18 16:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Sure. I take it that I can drop this function entirely then?
>
> Yeah, if it's a simple response, should be fine.
>
> > BTW, why is
> > that function name the same as a struct name? It confuses my ctags.
>
> Yeahhh, didn't think about ctags... :/
> Topic for another series: probably can be renamed to cros_ec_cmd() (just to keep ctags happy) ?
>
But then there'll be two cros_ec_cmd() because there's a
cros-ec-regulator. Fun! :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists