[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418110455.2559264-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:04:55 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] clk: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index ed119182aa1b..544e940bf40b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -113,12 +113,8 @@ static int clk_pm_runtime_get(struct clk_core *core)
if (!core->rpm_enabled)
return 0;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(core->dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(core->dev);
- return ret;
- }
- return 0;
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(core->dev);
+ return ret;
}
static void clk_pm_runtime_put(struct clk_core *core)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists