linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3568 pcie2x1 controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:45:02 -0400
From:   Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3568 pcie2x1 controller

On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 6:23 PM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/16/22 13:17, Peter Geis wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 6:08 AM Dmitry Osipenko
> > <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> On 4/16/22 13:05, Peter Geis wrote:
> >>> +     pcie2x1: pcie@...60000 {
> >>> +             compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie";
> >>> +             #address-cells = <3>;
> >>> +             #size-cells = <2>;
> >>> +             bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> >>> +             assigned-clocks = <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_MST>, <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_SLV>,
> >>> +                      <&cru ACLK_PCIE20_DBI>, <&cru PCLK_PCIE20>,
> >>> +                      <&cru CLK_PCIE20_AUX_NDFT>;
> >>
> >> Why these assigned-clocks are needed? I don't see anything assigned in
> >> this patchset.
> >
> > Ah, those are remnants of early bringup when performance wasn't good
> > and I was manually setting clock rates.
>
> If it's not needed, should it be removed then? Otherwise it looks like
> something is missing in the DT in regards to the assigned clocks.

Yes, it has been removed from the V7.
Thanks!