linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <735863d6476605e4ff72032d8971ac0d@walle.cc>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:04:16 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to
 YAML format

Am 2022-04-18 13:13, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 18/04/2022 10:19, Michael Walle wrote:
>> [resend, use Krysztof's new email address]
>> 
>> Am 2022-04-18 01:41, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 9:47 PM Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Convert the ocelot-pinctrl device tree binding to the new YAML 
>>>> format.
>>>> 
>>>> Additionally to the original binding documentation, add interrupt
>>>> properties which are optional and already used on several SoCs like
>>>> SparX-5, Luton, Ocelot and LAN966x but were not documented before.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, on the sparx5 and the lan966x SoCs there are two items for the
>>>> reg property.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>>> 
>>> So is this single patch something I should apply to the pin control
>>> tree?
>> 
>> The first five patches will fix the validation errrors once the
>> binding is converted to the YAML format. So, do they need to go
>> through the same tree?
>> 
>> Also as mentioned, there is this pending series [1] which is the
>> reason I've converted the binding to YAML in the first place. So
>> at least the first patch of this series will have to go through
>> the same tree as the YAML conversion patch.
>> 
>> How can we move forward here? Krzysztof, maybe all of the dt
>> bindings patches can go through your tree and I'll reposting
>> the second patch of [1] afterwards?
> 
> I think you got all necessary acks for this pinctrl bindings change and
> the dependency ("add reset property"), so both can go via Linus' tree.
> That's preferred.
> 
> DTS patches goes through your SoC maintainer tree.

Ah, ok, I wasn't aware of that. Then yes, please go ahead and
pick this and the first patch of [1] up, Linus.

Of course if you like you can pick the second patch of [1],
too. But I can also repost it without the RFC tag if that is
preferred.

-michael

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220313154640.63813-1-michael@walle.cc/