lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418121203.762844331@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:12:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 115/189] drm/amdkfd: Check for potential null return of kmalloc_array()

From: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>

[ Upstream commit ebbb7bb9e80305820dc2328a371c1b35679f2667 ]

As the kmalloc_array() may return null, the 'event_waiters[i].wait' would lead to null-pointer dereference.
Therefore, it is better to check the return value of kmalloc_array() to avoid this confusion.

Signed-off-by: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_events.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_events.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_events.c
index 3eea4edee355..b8bdd796cd91 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_events.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_events.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ static struct kfd_event_waiter *alloc_event_waiters(uint32_t num_events)
 	event_waiters = kmalloc_array(num_events,
 					sizeof(struct kfd_event_waiter),
 					GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!event_waiters)
+		return NULL;
 
 	for (i = 0; (event_waiters) && (i < num_events) ; i++) {
 		init_wait(&event_waiters[i].wait);
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ