[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418121145.434691010@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:12:06 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 004/105] cpuidle: PSCI: Move the `has_lpi` check to the beginning of the function
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
commit 01f6c7338ce267959975da65d86ba34f44d54220 upstream.
Currently the first thing checked is whether the PCSI cpu_suspend function
has been initialized.
Another change will be overloading `acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe` and
calling it sooner. So make the `has_lpi` check the first thing checked
to prepare for that change.
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsig
struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
+ if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/*
* If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
* idle states must not be enabled, so bail out
@@ -61,9 +64,6 @@ static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsig
if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
- return -EINVAL;
-
count = pr->power.count - 1;
if (count <= 0)
return -ENODEV;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists