linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 175/189] timers: Fix warning condition in __run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:13:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 175/189] timers: Fix warning condition in __run_timers()

From: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>

commit c54bc0fc84214b203f7a0ebfd1bd308ce2abe920 upstream.

When the timer base is empty, base::next_expiry is set to base::clk +
NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA and base::next_expiry_recalc is false. When no timer
is queued until jiffies reaches base::next_expiry value, the warning for
not finding any expired timer and base::next_expiry_recalc is false in
__run_timers() triggers.

To prevent triggering the warning in this valid scenario
base::timers_pending needs to be added to the warning condition.

Fixes: 31cd0e119d50 ("timers: Recalculate next timer interrupt only when necessary")
Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220405191732.7438-3-anna-maria@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/time/timer.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1722,11 +1722,14 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct t
 	       time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
 		levels = collect_expired_timers(base, heads);
 		/*
-		 * The only possible reason for not finding any expired
-		 * timer at this clk is that all matching timers have been
-		 * dequeued.
+		 * The two possible reasons for not finding any expired
+		 * timer at this clk are that all matching timers have been
+		 * dequeued or no timer has been queued since
+		 * base::next_expiry was set to base::clk +
+		 * NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc
+			     && base->timers_pending);
 		base->clk++;
 		base->next_expiry = __next_timer_interrupt(base);