linux-kernel - [Question] SCSI_EH: How does EH guarantee there is no UAF of scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 22:28:07 +0800
From:   Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Feilong Lin <linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: [Question] SCSI_EH: How does EH guarantee there is no UAF of
 scsi_cmnd if host reset failed

Hi all, I am wondered how does SCSI EH guarantee there is no UAF of scsi_cmnd
if host reset failed. If host reset failed and eh_cmd_q of shost is not empty,
these command in eh_cmd_q would be added to done_q in scsi_eh_offline_sdevs()
and finished by scsi_eh_flush_done_q(). So these scsi_cmnd and it's related
request would be freed.

While since host reset failed, we can not guarantee the LLDDs has cleared all
references to these commands in eh_cmd_q. Is there any possibility that the
LLDDs reference to these commands? If this happened, then a using after free
issue would occur.

Waiting for your response.