linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm/highmem: Fix kernel-doc warnings in highmem*.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6767543.18pcnM708K@leap>
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:09:04 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/highmem: Fix kernel-doc warnings in highmem*.h

On martedì 19 aprile 2022 16:52:22 CEST Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 03:25:16PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
>
> [snip]
> 
> I think you should gather all these patches together into a series and 
submit.
> If I am following correctly there are at least 4 patches now?  But I'm 
unsure
> of which ones are stand alone.
> 
> It would be easier to see what changes are being made along the way as 
well as
> the final result of the fixes.
> 
> Ira

Yes, this is perfectly reasonable. There are only three patches (this patch 
plus two more in a series). Since they are all related in some way, it is 
best to bring them together into one series which I will rework taking into 
account both yours and Matthew's suggestions.

Thanks,

Fabio