[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdanmmwfMHHQsK+d_CXq92YkFj4Pw0EhsJStukL6C7Qa0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:51:17 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] gpiolib: more helpers and fwnode conversion
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 9:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> This is a spin-off (*) of the previous work of switching GPIO library
> to use fwnode instead of of_node. Here we introduce a couple of
> a new macro helpers, which allows to switch some of the drivers
> to use fwnode and partially fwnode APIs. As a result of this cleanup
> a few drivers switched to use GPIO fwnode instead of of_node.
>
> *) it's subset of it with a new (patch 1) helper.
>
> Marek, Martin, can you give this a try?
> This requires at least two patches for GPIO library to be applied.
>
> Bart, Linus, I can take it thru my tree with an immutable branch if
> it's the way you prefer, otherwise please suggest on how to proceed.
Hmmm that sounds best, patch 1 does not apply to the pinctrl
tree so I suppose there are already dependencies in the GPIO
tree?
FWIW, the series:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
I'm of course a fan of this nice refactoring series.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists